18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Firestone Roadhawk 2

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

6

3

Best position

#6

#3

#2

Average position

19.3

4.7

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

2

146

34

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison