18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Number of tests
6
3
9
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
19.3
3.7
5.8
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
2
34
92

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
82%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
81%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
66%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
70%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
88%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison