18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

BF Goodrich g-GripUpper-middle
BFBF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Also compare with
SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870 PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
6
3
2
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
19.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
2
34
23

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison