18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

BF Goodrich g-GripUpper-middle
BFBF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870 Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
3
26
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
19.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
2
34
66

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison