18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
6
3
33
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
19.3
3.7
4.1
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
2
34
658

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison