18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
2
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
19.3
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
2
23
40

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison