18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Yokohama
Advan Fleva V701
Number of tests
6
36
4
Best position
#6
#1
#14
Average position
19.3
3.1
16.0
Latest test
2019
2023
2019
Available sizes
2
296
49

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
84%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
85%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
73%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
62%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
60%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
35%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
69%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
96%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
96%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
95%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison