18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs. Viking WinTech vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Barum
Polaris 5
Vredestein
Wintrac Pro
Viking
WinTech
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
13
37
6
17
Best position
#9
#1
#11
#1
Average position
15.2
6.4
20.8
1.7
Latest test
2024
2024
2024
2025
Available sizes
76
128
59
80

Wet

Wet
Barum Polaris 5
62%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Barum Polaris 5
63%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
80%
Viking WinTech
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Barum Polaris 5
64%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
73%
Viking WinTech
46%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet handling
Barum Polaris 5
56%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
85%
Viking WinTech
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
78%
Viking WinTech
52%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet circle cornering
Barum Polaris 5
66%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
86%
Viking WinTech
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Dry

Dry
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
78%
Viking WinTech
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
80%
Viking WinTech
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
79%
Viking WinTech
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry driving behavior
Barum Polaris 5
51%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82%
Viking WinTech
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%

Snow

Snow
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75%
Viking WinTech
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Snow braking
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
64%
Viking WinTech
47%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow cornering
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
76%
Viking WinTech
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Comfort

Comfort
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75%
Viking WinTech
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Exterior noise
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
72%
Viking WinTech
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comfort
Barum Polaris 5
61%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Interior noise
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
78%
Viking WinTech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Costs

Costs
Barum Polaris 5
80%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
66%
Viking WinTech
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Mileage
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
62%
Viking WinTech
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Price/value
Barum Polaris 5
86%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Rolling resistance
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Ice

Ice
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
81%
Viking WinTech
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice braking
Barum Polaris 5
77%
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82%
Viking WinTech
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison