18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Test Profile

Barum
Polaris 3
Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Number of tests
10
8
23
23
Best position
#3
#12
#1
#1
Average position
10.6
22.3
6.7
2.3
Latest test
2018
2021
2025
2021
Available sizes
67
43
107
76

Wet

Wet
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Wet circle cornering
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Wet handling
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Wet braking
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%

Snow

Snow
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%
Snow braking
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%
Snow cornering
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
93%
Snow handling
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Snow traction
Barum Polaris 3
89%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%

Costs

Costs
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Mileage
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
77%
Price/value
Barum Polaris 3
81%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
68%
Rolling resistance
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%
Exterior noise
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Comfort
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
90%

Dry

Dry
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Dry braking
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Dry handling
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison