18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Barum
Polaris 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
10
10
Best position
#3
#2
Average position
10.6
6.0
Latest test
2018
2026
Available sizes
67
104

Wet

Wet
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet circle cornering
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet braking
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%

Snow

Snow
Barum Polaris 3
87%

Costs

Costs
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Barum Polaris 3
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison