18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Barum
Polaris 3
Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
10
1
14
Best position
#3
#6
#8
Average position
10.6
6.0
13.4
Latest test
2018
2018
2026
Available sizes
67
25
153

Wet

Wet
Barum Polaris 3
74%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Barum Polaris 3
84%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Barum Polaris 3
71%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Barum Polaris 3
65%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Snow

Snow
Barum Polaris 3
87%

Costs

Costs
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Barum Polaris 3
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Barum Polaris 3
68%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Dry

Dry
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry handling
Barum Polaris 3
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dry braking
Barum Polaris 3
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Barum Polaris 3
79%
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Comfort
Barum Polaris 3
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison