18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Austone SP901 vs. Goodride SW608 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Austone
SP901
Goodride
SW608
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
6
6
3
Best position
#9
#11
#4
Average position
27.0
31.5
4.3
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
31
67
97

Wet

Wet
Austone SP901
35%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Wet braking
Austone SP901
27%
Goodride SW608
31%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Austone SP901
38%
Goodride SW608
14%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Wet circle cornering
Austone SP901
42%
Goodride SW608
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Austone SP901
46%
Goodride SW608
6%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Wet handling
Austone SP901
30%
Goodride SW608
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%

Snow

Snow
Austone SP901
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Snow braking
Austone SP901
88%
Goodride SW608
15%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Snow cornering
Austone SP901
96%
Goodride SW608
42%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Snow traction
Austone SP901
84%
Goodride SW608
14%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Austone SP901
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
Austone SP901
78%
Goodride SW608
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Dry

Dry
Austone SP901
47%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry braking
Austone SP901
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dry handling
Austone SP901
33%
Goodride SW608
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Costs

Costs
Austone SP901
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolling resistance
Austone SP901
78%
Goodride SW608
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison