In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (ARIVO) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than ARIVO (0%). The first tyre test of ARIVO Carlforful A/S was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the Carlforful A/S and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested.
| # | ARIVO Carlforful A/S
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ARIVO Carlforful A/S Rating: Not recommended | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| GOODYEAR Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||