Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Budget

Apollo

Aspire XP Winter

VS

WinterContact TS 870

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test Profile

Aspire XP Winter

WinterContact TS 870

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

8

17

49

Best position

#1

Average position

13.6

1.7

3.2

Latest test

2025

2024

Available sizes

29

80

213

Wet

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

66%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Wet braking

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

59%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

56%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

55%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Wet handling

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Snow

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Snow braking

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Snow traction

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

62%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Snow cornering

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Snow handling

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Costs

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

66%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Mileage

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

28%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Rolling resistance

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Price/value

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Dry

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry braking

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

41%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dry handling

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Comfort

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Exterior noise

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Comfort

Apollo Aspire XP Winter

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Ice

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Ice braking

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2023	225/45 R17	View

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Aspire XP Winter

WinterContact TS 870

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison