Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Viking WinTech

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Budget

Sava

Eskimo HP2

WinTech

5.3

R13 – R20

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Eskimo HP2

WinTech

Number of tests

1

15

6

Best position

#6

#11

Average position

6.0

15.5

20.8

Latest test

2018

2025

2024

Available sizes

25

28

59

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Viking WinTech

55%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Sava Eskimo HP2

67%

Viking WinTech

61%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Sava Eskimo HP2

59%

Viking WinTech

62%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Sava Eskimo HP2

69%

Viking WinTech

46%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Sava Eskimo HP2

60%

Viking WinTech

52%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Viking WinTech

52%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Sava Eskimo HP2

71%

Viking WinTech

63%

Dry driving behavior

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Sava Eskimo HP2

74%

Viking WinTech

78%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

Viking WinTech

72%

Fuel efficiency

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

93%

Sava Eskimo HP2

89%

Viking WinTech

82%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

Viking WinTech

67%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

Viking WinTech

66%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Sava Eskimo HP2

62%

Viking WinTech

61%

Interior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

Sava Eskimo HP2

79%

Viking WinTech

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Viking WinTech

Amazer 4G ECO

Eskimo HP2

WinTech

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison