18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Apollo Amazer 4G ECOBudget
ApolloApollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15
Petlas Imperium PT515Budget
PetlasPetlas

Imperium PT515

4.2
R15 – R16
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Petlas
Imperium PT515
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
5
6
Best position
#6
#13
#3
Average position
6.0
24.0
4.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
Available sizes
25
11
146

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Fuel efficiency
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
93%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison