Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

4

1

3

Best position

#6

#3

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

12.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

25

111

64

34

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison