Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

4

3

1

Best position

#6

#3

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

12.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

25

111

34

64

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison