18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
1
10
49
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
12.2
3.2
Latest test
2018
2024
2024
Available sizes
25
207
213

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry driving behavior
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison