18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
1
10
23
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
12.2
6.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
Available sizes
25
207
107

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison