18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
10
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
25
104
40

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison