18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
10
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
25
104
34

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison