18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

10

3

Best position

#6

#2

#2

Average position

6.0

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

25

104

34

Wet

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Costs

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison