Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Kleber

Quadraxer 3

RADIAL ClimateActive

8.3

R16

Also compare with

Cinturato All Season SF3

Quatrac

CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Quadraxer 3

RADIAL ClimateActive

Number of tests

1

13

3

Best position

#6

#4

#5

Average position

6.0

6.3

7.3

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

25

111

1

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

70%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

85%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

81%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

68%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

70%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

69%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

53%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

79%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

78%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

77%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Amazer 4G ECO

Quadraxer 3

RADIAL ClimateActive

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison