Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Viking WinTech

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Hankook

Kinergy 4S2

WinTech

5.3

R13 – R20

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Kinergy 4S2

WinTech

Number of tests

1

4

6

Best position

#6

#2

#11

Average position

6.0

5.0

20.8

Latest test

2018

2025

2024

Available sizes

25

—

59

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Viking WinTech

55%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

70%

Viking WinTech

46%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Viking WinTech

52%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Viking WinTech

52%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

73%

Viking WinTech

61%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Viking WinTech

62%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

61%

Viking WinTech

72%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

51%

Viking WinTech

67%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

71%

Viking WinTech

66%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Viking WinTech

61%

Interior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

65%

Viking WinTech

71%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Viking WinTech

63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Viking WinTech

Amazer 4G ECO

Kinergy 4S2

WinTech

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison