18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Hankook
ION Evo
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
1
1
14
Best position
#6
#1
#8
Average position
6.0
1.0
13.4
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
25
64
153

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison