Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

23

3

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

25

176

34

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Amazer 4G ECO

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison