18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
24
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
2.7
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
302
34

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison