18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
3
10
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
6.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
25
40
104

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison