18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
3
6
3
Best position
#6
#2
#3
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
25
40
146
34

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison