Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

5

3

1

Best position

#6

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

2.2

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

25

63

34

64

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Amazer 4G ECO

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison