18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
16
4
3
Best position
#6
#3
#3
#2
Average position
6.0
5.5
12.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
153
111
34

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison