18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
16
4
2
Best position
#6
#3
#3
#1
Average position
6.0
5.5
12.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
153
111
23

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison