18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
16
1
3
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
5.5
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
153
64
34

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison