18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
16
6
3
Best position
#6
#3
#3
#2
Average position
6.0
5.5
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
25
153
146
34

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison