18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
16
3
1
Best position
#6
#3
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
5.5
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2018
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
153
34
64

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison