18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Number of tests
1
18
3
9
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
6.1
3.7
5.8
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
47
34
92

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
82%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
81%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
78%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
66%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison