18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

VS

Firestone Roadhawk

Firestone

Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

Firestone

Roadhawk

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Number of tests

1

21

14

Best position

#6

#2

#8

Average position

6.0

11.9

13.4

Latest test

2018

2024

2026

Available sizes

25

164

153

Wet

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Dry

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry driving behavior

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Costs

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Fuel efficiency

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

93%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Comfort

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Interior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison