Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Ziex

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

1

3

5

Best position

#6

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

3.7

4.7

2.2

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

25

34

126

63

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Ziex

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison