18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
3
1
3
Best position
#6
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
25
34
64
40

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison