Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

1

3

5

6

Best position

#6

#2

#1

#3

Average position

6.0

3.7

2.2

4.7

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

25

34

63

146

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Amazer 4G ECO

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison