Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Dunlop

Winter

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Winter

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

1

2

49

Best position

#6

#1

Average position

6.0

1.5

3.2

Latest test

2018

2025

2024

Available sizes

25

65

213

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Interior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry driving behavior

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Amazer 4G ECO

Winter

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison