18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
1
49
24
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
3.2
2.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
Available sizes
25
213
302

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry driving behavior
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison