18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
1
23
3
Best position
#6
#1
#4
Average position
6.0
6.7
4.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
107
97

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison