18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
1
23
14
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
6.7
3.6
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
25
107
188

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison