18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

VS

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Apollo (29%). The first tyre test of Apollo Amazer 4G ECO was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested.

Test Profile

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Number of tests

1

23

Best position

#6

#1

Average position

6.0

6.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

25

107

Wet

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Comfort

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Dry

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Costs

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison