Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Advantage

WinTech

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

1

14

6

3

Best position

#6

#8

#11

#2

Average position

6.0

13.4

20.8

3.3

Latest test

2018

2026

2024

2026

Available sizes

25

153

59

60

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

55%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Viking WinTech

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Viking WinTech

46%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Viking WinTech

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Viking WinTech

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Viking WinTech

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Viking WinTech

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Viking WinTech

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Amazer 4G ECO

Advantage

WinTech

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison