18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Viking
WinTech
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
1
14
6
24
Best position
#6
#8
#11
#1
Average position
6.0
13.4
20.8
2.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
25
153
59
302

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Viking WinTech
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Viking WinTech
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Viking WinTech
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Viking WinTech
46%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Viking WinTech
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Viking WinTech
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Viking WinTech
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Viking WinTech
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Viking WinTech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Viking WinTech
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Viking WinTech
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison