18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
14
3
3
Best position
#6
#8
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
13.4
4.7
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
25
153
126
40

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison