18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

1

14

10

Best position

#6

#8

#2

Average position

6.0

13.4

6.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2026

Available sizes

25

153

104

Wet

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dry

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Costs

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison