18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
1
14
23
Best position
#6
#8
#1
Average position
6.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
25
153
176

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry driving behavior
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison